Florida Rule 2.515 is now in force

Your signature now stands behind every legal authority.

Since June 15, 2026, a signer of a Florida court filing represents that the legal authorities identified in it exist and are accurately cited. Feanor installs the verification workflow, secure AI systems and staff controls your firm needs before anything reaches the court.

Request your filing risk review →See the implementation
FOR FLORIDA LITIGATION FIRMS · 3 TO 25 ATTORNEYS · HUMAN REVIEW REMAINS REQUIRED
EFFECTIVE JUNE 15, 2026

Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.515(d)(2)

The signer represents that the legal authorities identified in the filing exist and are accurately cited.

The requirement is not limited to documents drafted with AI. After notice and an opportunity to be heard, the rule permits sanctions for an inconsistent filing.

Reprimand or contemptFiling struckProceeding dismissedCosts and attorneys' fees
The problem

Buying an AI app does not create a firm-wide control system.

Staff are already experimenting. Partners remain responsible. The missing layer is a repeatable, documented process for using the tools safely and productively.

No uniform pre-filing check

Citations and quotations are reviewed differently by each lawyer, under deadline pressure and across disconnected tools.

Confidential data moves without visibility

Partners may not know which public systems receive client material or what each provider retains.

Subscriptions do not become workflows

A product may be powerful, but adoption fails without owners, training, acceptance tests and integration into daily work.

Senior time disappears into repeat work

Discovery summaries, chronologies, intake, demand preparation and document review still start from zero.

The Feanor implementation

TruthSeeker first. Then two workflows that create capacity.

The full program leaves the firm with three accepted workflows, trained users, named owners, human approval rules and runbooks.

01
Required

TruthSeeker pre-filing verification

Extract authorities, flag suspicious citations or quotations, produce a review report and document lawyer approval before filing.

02
Required

Secure legal-document workflow

Controlled summarization, drafting, review or matter search designed around the firm's real systems and confidentiality requirements.

03
Firm chooses

Capacity or revenue workflow

Intake, discovery summarization, demand preparation, deposition analysis, case chronology or document collection.

How it works

From exposure review to accepted workflow.

01

Review

Map current tools, data paths, filing controls, repeated work and staff practices.

02

Design

Define users, permitted data, owner, human approval, failure path and acceptance test.

03

Install

Configure the right products and custom components around real firm material.

04

Train and prove

Run acceptance tests, train the team, document controls and hand over the runbook.

Two firm sizes, two engagements

Pay for the implementation your firm can actually use.

The smaller sprint solves the immediate Rule 2.515 readiness problem. The full program adds two high-value operating workflows.

APPROXIMATELY 3 TO 7 ATTORNEYS

Rule 2.515 Readiness Sprint

$7,500 fixed · 30 days
  • AI exposure assessment
  • Rule 2.515 pre-filing procedure
  • TruthSeeker pilot and one accepted workflow
  • AI-use policy framework
  • One practical staff session
  • Written next-step recommendations
One accepted workflow by day 30 or a $2,500 refund if the failure is Feanor's delivery. The firm must provide an internal owner, timely access and decisions, staff participation, and acceptance testing.
APPROXIMATELY 8 TO 25 ATTORNEYS

Legal AI Safety & Workflow Program

$7,500 / month · three months · $22,500 total
  • Rule 2.515 filing verification workflow
  • Secure legal-document workflow
  • One capacity or revenue workflow
  • Staff training and executive reviews
  • Policies, controls, tests and runbooks
  • Implementation inside existing tools
If fewer than three workflows are accepted by day 90 because of Feanor's delivery failure, we refund $2,500 for each missing workflow. The firm must provide an internal owner, timely access and decisions, staff participation, and acceptance testing.

Hardware, licensed legal databases, major migrations and unusual third-party costs are quoted transparently. Continuing stewardship is available after implementation from $2,500 per month.

Software plus implementation

We do not ask you to replace good legal technology.

Harvey, CoCounsel, Lexis+ AI, Clearbrief, Spellbook and Clio can all be useful. Feanor selects, connects and governs the components that fit your firm.

Applications provideFeanor provides
Access to drafting, research, citation, document and matter features.A firm-specific workflow with owners, approved data, acceptance tests and human review.
Vendor security and product documentation.A cross-tool map showing where firm information moves and who can use each system.
General product onboarding and support.Training on the firm's actual work, policies and escalation rules.
A product roadmap controlled by the vendor.Implementation accountability across products, custom components and staff adoption.
The objective is not to own the most AI tools. It is to know which tools your firm approves, where data goes, who reviews the output and whether the workflow works before it reaches a client or court.
Francisco Cordoba Otalora
Who builds it

Francisco Cordoba Otalora

FOUNDER, FEANOR · MIT INNOVATOR UNDER 35 · MARIE CURIE RESEARCH FELLOW

Francisco has spent 15 years building technology companies and teaching. He was named an MIT Technology Review Innovator Under 35 in 2018, wrote Beat the Humans on the future of work with AI, and has spoken on emerging technology at Google I/O, Imperial College London and the World Economic Forum.

He builds and runs production AI systems for operating teams across three continents, including TruthSeeker, the citation-verification engine at the center of this program. Feanor turns that work into systems a client can understand, test and operate.

MIT Innovator Under 35Marie Curie Research FellowAuthor, Beat the HumansProduction AI on 3 continents
Speaking engagements and recognition
Questions partners ask

Clear answers before implementation.

Does Rule 2.515 require us to buy software?

No. It creates a representation by the filing signer and express sanctions authority. Feanor provides an operational way to manage that responsibility.

Does TruthSeeker replace lawyer review?

No. It supports a repeatable verification process. The lawyer remains responsible for professional judgment and final approval.

Do we have to replace Westlaw, Lexis or Harvey?

No. Feanor can configure and govern existing tools when they are the right components for the workflow.

Will our documents remain private?

Data handling depends on the architecture and vendors the firm approves. We document the actual data path and never make unsupported privacy absolutes.

The next step

Start with a Rule 2.515 Filing Risk Review.

We review the firm's current AI use, citation controls, confidential-data paths and highest-value repeated legal work. Then we recommend the right engagement and the exact first workflow.

Write to [email protected] →
NO CONFIDENTIAL FILE IS REQUIRED FOR THE FIRST CONVERSATION